FOUR-SLIDE TEXT STORYBOARD
Original fictional newsletter case. No meeting outcome or launch approval is supplied.
Audience: The fictional newsletter's editors
Decision: Should the newsletter team prepare a two-edition glossary pilot, or keep the current process? If preparation is wanted, who could own it?

SLIDE 1
TITLE
Should we prepare a shared glossary pilot?

ON-SLIDE COPY
Decision requested: prepare a trial, or keep the current process.
The launch and start date remain undecided.

SPEAKER NOTES
Today I am asking whether we should prepare a shared glossary trial for the newsletter team or keep the current process. If the team wants to prepare a trial, we need to identify a possible owner. There is no launch approval or agreed start date. I will show the supplied wording examples, the small scope we could try, and what preparation would need.

SLIDE 2
TITLE
Term choices currently live in separate notes

ON-SLIDE COPY
Supplied noun examples: check-in and check in.
The examples identify a question to investigate; they do not establish how often it happens.

SPEAKER NOTES
The supplied examples use check-in and check in for the same noun, while term choices live in separate notes. This comparison does not choose a preferred form. These are two authored examples, not a measured error rate or evidence about every edition. They give us a concrete question for a possible glossary trial without proving that a new system is necessary.

SLIDE 3
TITLE
Try a small page before choosing a platform

ON-SLIDE COPY
Proposed scope: one glossary page, one editor, two editions.
Keep the existing editorial approval path.

SPEAKER NOTES
The proposed scope is one shared glossary page, one editor keeping it current, and two editions. The existing editorial approval path would still govern wording. We are not asking to buy or build a platform. The page is the option being proposed, not a software specification or an approved launch.

SLIDE 4
TITLE
Agree what preparation would require

ON-SLIDE COPY
If the team wants to prepare a trial, identify a possible owner and initial terms.
Confirm availability and review questions before setting a date.
Time savings remain unmeasured.

SPEAKER NOTES
If we want to prepare the trial, let us identify a possible editor and the initial terms to bring forward. We still need to confirm availability and the review questions before setting a date. Time savings have not been measured, so the trial should not be introduced as a proven efficiency improvement. If we keep the current process, record that decision too. The meeting outcome needs to be written down after the team decides.