Repair the complete deliberately wrong report using only the complete PROGRESS-01 source packet supplied with this request. Return the whole corrected update for Alex, followed by a separate compact claim-to-record table, not a list of suggested edits. Use the reporting period 2030-05-06 through 2030-05-10 and cutoff 2030-05-10 16:00 UTC. These are fictional case dates. Compare the current state with the previous update P0. Preserve the completed export and local check of all 24 index entries after one link replacement. Do not extend that result to sharing or access from other people's accounts. Preserve the saved handout v3 and its page 3 revision without calling it a reviewed or approved final handout. Keep both R6 and R7 visible: Ready has no approver, revision identifier or approval receipt; Dee has not reviewed changed page 3 in v3 or given final approval. Do not infer that another person approved it, or that Dee is the only authorized approver. A later timestamp alone cannot settle approval. Include the R8 request for Alex to confirm who can give final review and resolve the tracker status. The supported next step is to request that review after the reviewer is confirmed. Keep the workshop unscheduled and its date undecided. State that no handout completion date is agreed and no handout distribution record is supplied. Remove invented distribution, recipient access, approval, dates, owners, completion percentages and outcome metrics. Do not quietly downgrade the completed local check just because final handout approval is unresolved. Prepare text only: do not send the update, access tools, contact anyone, change the tracker, schedule the workshop or perform the reported work. COMPLETE SOURCE PACKET Original fictional teaching case PROGRESS-01. No real company records, tool output, model trial or customer data. Reader: Alex, the writer's manager. Alex needs changed work status and a concrete help request. Period: 2030-05-06 through 2030-05-10. Cutoff: 2030-05-10 16:00 UTC. These dates belong only to the fictional case. P0 — Previous update, 2030-05-03 Quick-start handout: version 1 drafted; review still pending. Resource index: export and link check planned, not yet done. Workshop: no date agreed. Next: revise the handout after review and prepare the index. Current records: R1 | 2030-05-06T10:00:00Z | writer work log Quick-start handout v2 saved. This is a revised draft, not a review or approval record. R2 | 2030-05-07T11:00:00Z | named reviewer message Dee checked pages 1 and 2 of handout v2. Page 3 needs clearer wording. Dee has not approved the whole handout. R3 | 2030-05-08T12:00:00Z | writer work log Handout v3 saved with page 3 revised. No review of v3 is recorded in this entry. R4 | 2030-05-09T09:00:00Z | index check log Resource index exported with 24 entries. 23 links opened in the local check; one link was broken. The check is incomplete. R5 | 2030-05-10T13:00:00Z | index check log Broken link replaced. All 24 links opened in this local check. The index has not been shared. This record says nothing about access from other users' accounts. R6 | 2030-05-10T14:00:00Z | tracker snapshot Handout status field says Ready. It provides no approver, revision identifier or approval receipt. R7 | 2030-05-10T15:00:00Z | named reviewer message Dee says: I have not reviewed the changed page 3 in v3. I have not given final approval. This message does not identify any other final approver. R8 | 2030-05-10T15:40:00Z | writer planning note Ask Alex to confirm who can give final review and resolve the Ready label. Then request the review; do not call the handout approved until supported. No handout distribution record is supplied. Workshop date is still undecided; keep it unscheduled. No completion date or outcome metric is agreed. COMPLETE DELIBERATELY WRONG REPORT Learning library refresh — all work complete The quick-start handout is approved and has been sent to everyone. The resource index is complete and shared, and all colleagues can open every link. The workshop is confirmed for 2030-05-12. We are 100% finished and have improved engagement by 20%. No help is needed.