Blog / Editorial policy

How we prepare these guides

Practical materials from the CueSpec team, with clear sources and openly credited AI assistance.

CueSpec Workflow Editors

The CueSpec team’s editorial role for practical AI-workflow guides and reusable examples. This is a team responsibility, not a fictional individual author.

CueSpec Research Editors

The CueSpec team’s editorial role for source-based comparisons and workflow evaluation methods. A research role does not imply an independent laboratory or product test.

AI assistance and editorial responsibility

Drafted and reviewed using AI assistance. We use AI to structure drafts, prepare illustrative examples and check consistency. The named team role remains responsible for the article. AI is credited as a contributor, not presented as a human reviewer or witness.

Fictional examples are labeled where they begin. A worksheet with blank results is a tool for your own work, not benchmark evidence. Sources support the specific claims beside them; product instructions remain in CueSpec Docs.

Review and updates

These article versions have a recorded factual review by an AI review role. The named team role remains accountable. This is not a human review or a hands-on product test. Dates describe actual publication or substantive changes, in UTC. Translations are linked only when a complete translated article exists.

Suggest a correction

Use the CueSpec contact options and include the article URL and the passage or source that needs attention. Do not send credentials or private project material.